<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Online Bible Institute | Kyle Meeder | Activity</title>
	<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/members/kylemeeder/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/members/kylemeeder/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Kyle Meeder.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 03:50:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=3.4.3</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">42771749887bdd4bc4f8eb43fc8ce388</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted an update: ·       Adam and Eve are the focus of this Module, [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/72297/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 21:49:45 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>·       Adam and Eve are the focus of this Module, which then dives into evolution.  As in the other models, theories are being touted as actual science when we have neither observed nor repeated (the definition of science) execution of these theories.  The videos of Josh Swamidass were entertaining.  Namely, explaining the hypothesis of&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-72297"><a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/72297/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5616b07a162e3b294d494985ba252d18</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted an update: I start this module’s discussion by stating that I am a [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/72148/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2025 05:11:21 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I start this module’s discussion by stating that I am a simple man.  Because I am a simple man, I like to break complex things down into simple terms to comprehend and analyze them.  For example, the term “science,” instead of an amorphous absolute truth, is best defined in two very simple words: observable, repeatable.  If we observe it and&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-72148"><a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/72148/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a9244de342020da141f5c0d570040407</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted an update: The Holloway article seeks to liken the differing [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/71172/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 23:27:56 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Holloway article seeks to liken the differing ark/deluge accounts to the temples associated with the corresponding cultures where we find each account (from Genesis, an ideal “Solomonic Temple” and from Mesopotamia’s Epic of Gilgamesh, a ziggurat).  This is done in an attempt to resolve the different dimensional aspects of the ark itself in&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-71172"><a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/71172/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">81fe53cd86f87336728a4e26aaa5bef8</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/70722/#acomment-71155</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:15:19 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the read and the comments, Teresa and Rubeena</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/members/kylemeeder/" data-bb-hp-profile="3129" rel="nofollow">Kyle Meeder</a> posted an update <p>·       Module 1</p>

<p>There are many different reasoning and logic flaws that we may come across when discussing critiques of the Old Testament.  One such flaw is an argument [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c4d690e8f1daffb330c132080b1909ed</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/70723/#acomment-71154</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:14:39 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="atwho-inserted"><a class="bp-suggestions-mention" data-bb-hp-profile="2896" href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/members/teresaholcombe/" rel="nofollow">@teresaholcombe</a></span> Thank you for reading and commenting Teresa, all glory and honor to Jesus!</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/members/kylemeeder/" data-bb-hp-profile="3129" rel="nofollow">Kyle Meeder</a> posted an update <p>Module
two’s reading and podcast focused on context, literal interpretation of the
bible (including scientific claims or interpretations related in scripture,
such as the shape of [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2190bdc985fa6199658f64126648587d</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted a new activity comment</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/70765/#acomment-71153</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:13:56 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for reading and commenting Emmarick and Tammie!</p>
				<strong>In reply to</strong> -
					<a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/members/kylemeeder/" data-bb-hp-profile="3129" rel="nofollow">Kyle Meeder</a> posted an update <p>Module 3 compares biblical accounts to secular counterparts.  For example, the pre-readings focus on the flood account in Genesis (and compare to Near East accounts in the Enuma [&hellip;]</p>					]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d3fa32e2ce07eacc2756640371d88fd5</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted an update: “In the 20th century, Delitzsch’s lectures have come [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/71152/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 16:12:35 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“In the 20th century, Delitzsch’s lectures have come under close scrutiny, and most of what he argued must, in the opinion of virtually all scholars, be discarded.”  The preceeding sentence summarizes the entirety of the Delitzsch article, although that point is buried in misleading half-praise for him.  The main takeaway is that Delitzsch was&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-71152"><a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/71152/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">315411a709735468b77e394def273cf3</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted an update: Module 3 compares biblical accounts to secular [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/70765/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 04:18:36 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Module 3 compares biblical accounts to secular counterparts.  For example, the pre-readings focus on the flood account in Genesis (and compare to Near East accounts in the Enuma Elish, Gilgamesh, and Atrahasis) and Levitical laws as compared to the Code of Hammurabi, among others.  In discussing the flood, there is a rejection in the&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-70765"><a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/70765/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cbda664b9b53e844648300ca4ab03390</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted an update: Module
two’s reading and podcast focused on context, [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/70723/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 23:50:34 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Module<br />
two’s reading and podcast focused on context, literal interpretation of the<br />
bible (including scientific claims or interpretations related in scripture,<br />
such as the shape of the earth and whether the earth is the center of the solar<br />
system/universe), and bad interpretations of the bible.  What stood out to me was the different<br />
contexts&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-70723"><a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/70723/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">73d1004fd08f3d68fe070ef95d752aff</guid>
				<title>Kyle Meeder posted an update: ·       Module 1

There are many different reasoning [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/70722/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 23:49:44 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>·       Module 1</p>
<p>There are many different reasoning and logic flaws that we may come across when discussing critiques of the Old Testament.  One such flaw is an argument that correlation equals causation, or that one fact that tends to appear in the with a second fact is causing the second fact, which is not necessarily true.  Arguing from&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-70722"><a href="https://onlinebibleinstitute.org/activity/p/70722/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		